<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 50 scientific ways to be persuasive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://assess-systems.com.au/blog/2008/50-scientific-ways-to-be-persuasive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://assess-systems.com.au/blog/2008/50-scientific-ways-to-be-persuasive/</link>
	<description>Workplace Selection and Development Solutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:18:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Ollila</title>
		<link>http://assess-systems.com.au/blog/2008/50-scientific-ways-to-be-persuasive/comment-page-1/#comment-1421</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Ollila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 03:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://assess-systems.com.au/blog/current_reading/50-scientific-ways-to-be-persuasive/#comment-1421</guid>
		<description>The principle of Social Proof?  I guess that’s another name for the Bandwagon Effect.

Yes, I can see how that works, but I’m sure that with  people who consider themselves tolerably intelligent and capable of independent thought, it can easily backfire.  Your towel example is a case in point:

“Which request to reuse hotel towels gets the greatest response? Help save the environment by reusing your towels OR Join other guests that already reuse their towels.”

I would likely be more easily persuaded by the first argument. 

Although I believe that interdependence is often more valuable to a society than independence, I am personally put off by the thought of joining other guests in reusing  towels.  

As a matter of fact, I am surprised that argument would work with the majority of people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The principle of Social Proof?  I guess that’s another name for the Bandwagon Effect.</p>
<p>Yes, I can see how that works, but I’m sure that with  people who consider themselves tolerably intelligent and capable of independent thought, it can easily backfire.  Your towel example is a case in point:</p>
<p>“Which request to reuse hotel towels gets the greatest response? Help save the environment by reusing your towels OR Join other guests that already reuse their towels.”</p>
<p>I would likely be more easily persuaded by the first argument. </p>
<p>Although I believe that interdependence is often more valuable to a society than independence, I am personally put off by the thought of joining other guests in reusing  towels.  </p>
<p>As a matter of fact, I am surprised that argument would work with the majority of people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

