<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Positive self-statements backfire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://assess-systems.com.au/blog/2009/positive-self-statements-backfire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://assess-systems.com.au/blog/2009/positive-self-statements-backfire/</link>
	<description>Workplace Selection and Development Solutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:18:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Ollila</title>
		<link>http://assess-systems.com.au/blog/2009/positive-self-statements-backfire/comment-page-1/#comment-1420</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Ollila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 02:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://assess-systems.com.au/blog/?p=1257#comment-1420</guid>
		<description>That was an interesting study . . . and the results make sense if we assume the subjects sanely and realistically evaluated themselves and valued their own abilities  to accurately perceive reality.

When the low-self-esteem group repeated unreasonably positive self-statements, cognitive dissonance and anxiety created a wide self-credibility gap.  What they said about themselves and what they thought about themselves uncomfortably diverged. And the inconsistencies proved to great.

It’s no wonder they felt worse about themselves after the experiment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was an interesting study . . . and the results make sense if we assume the subjects sanely and realistically evaluated themselves and valued their own abilities  to accurately perceive reality.</p>
<p>When the low-self-esteem group repeated unreasonably positive self-statements, cognitive dissonance and anxiety created a wide self-credibility gap.  What they said about themselves and what they thought about themselves uncomfortably diverged. And the inconsistencies proved to great.</p>
<p>It’s no wonder they felt worse about themselves after the experiment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

