Your personality - who’s to blame?

Posted by Rob McKay on March 22, 2008
Filed Under Personality

Personality is stable after the age of about eighteen years, if you’re a parent you probably think it’s more like eight! Psychologists have found that there is about a four percent difference between eighteen and twenty years, but after we reach twenty we are stuck with who we are.

Can we change our personalities to fit certain situations? Yes, we can, but we will always revert back to home-base. Let me give you an example. Suppose we had an administrator whose personality was very accommodating, and he lacked high assertiveness and strong resilience.

The company he works for has suppliers who are dragging the chain paying their accounts. The boss gives the administrator a list of bad debtors and asks him to call all these people and tell them their supplies have been stopped, effective immediately, and they need to settle their account within 24 hours to reinstate delivery.

I bet this person is going to hate doing this task. Itâ€™s not in their nature to be so forthright and aggressive, but they will force themselves to do it â€“ its part of their job. However, if they had to do this task day-in and day-out they would soon lose internal motivation and decide this job is not for them and leave.

An analogy for personality is folding your arms. People will always fold them the same way. But if asked to fold them the opposite way, they will find this difficult and uncomfortable â€“ it can be done, but as soon as practical they will revert to a comfortable fold.

Moving to our second question, is personality genetic or environmentally shaped? In psychology this is the famous nature verses nurture debate. If you delve into the literature you will find many theories that basically explain a 60/40 balance. Toss a coin in the air to pick which way!

The Herald (NZ) this week reported a new study completed by a team of psychologists at the University of Edinburgh, lead by New Zealander Tim Bates. This study found compelling evidence that our personality is equally influenced by our genes and the environment.

This team studied 1000 pairs of identical and fraternal twins. Because identical twins have the same genes and fraternal twins do not, the researchers could identify common genes that result in certain personality traits â€“ they were concentrating on happiness.

The study showed that identical twins in a family were very similar in personality and in well-being, and by contrast, the fraternal twins were only half as similar. This finding strongly implicates genes as a major driver of personality traits. So, if youâ€™re a worry wart, you can lay fifty percent of the blame on your mum or dad and probably the other fifty on the way they brought you up!

As psychologists we have always known the huge role personality plays in a personâ€™s work performance. As a lay person at the coal face you can observe this in action every day. Stop right now and think about your problem employees. I bet the issue is attitude and or mental ability â€“ the who they are, not what they know.

Most managers will always hire on aptitude, but fire on attitude. Personality influences attitude and attitude drives behaviour. The problem with most hiring managers is that they tend to rely on emotional judgement (gut feel) to assess attitude during the interview process.

Itâ€™s impossible to read a personâ€™s personality when we first meet them. Yes, as humans we are predisposed to do this â€“ known as the flight or fight concept. Sometimes we get it right, many times we get it wrong. It is often dangerous to jump to instant conclusions. In psychology this is referred to as the Implicit Personality Theory. We tend to judge people by association - Anne is attractive, intelligent and (likeable/not likeable), Matthew is bold, defiant and (extroverted/introverted), Sue is cheerful, positive and (attractive/unattractive).

When selecting new staff itâ€™s important to ascertain if the person has the knowledge, skills and experience to do the job. It is probably more important to understand how that knowledge, skill and experience will be put this into practice. What are their personality characteristics and mental abilities and does this fit the job?

Many personality and mental ability measures are available. Itâ€™s vitally important that you choose the right ones for the role and that they are designed specifically for selection. There are many cheap, or free, pop psychology tests available on the Net or sold by people with no psychological background.

Test reliability and validity is extremely important when choosing a test â€“ by the way we like to call them assessments or profiles â€“ a test implies pass or fail and assessments used in the selection process are about whether the person will fit the job, not if they are a good, or bad person. Selection assessments are also not designed to highlight abnormal psychological behaviour.

Adding a valid personality and mental ability assessment, benchmarked to the job, to a multi-rated behavioural based interview centred on the competencies for the role will ensure you get an excellent performing employee about 75 percent of the time, damn sight better odds than relying on a general meet and greet and unstructured interview that is at best a friendly chat â€“ your odds of a successful hire here is about fifteen percent at best. Which path do you want to go down?

Bookmark to: